Securities Law Archive

Friday

11

July 2025

0

COMMENTS

Top 8 Best Investment Fraud Attorneys and Firms in the US

Written by , Posted in Securities Law

Investors and retirees who have been victimized by stockbroker violations or investment fraud need experienced, high-performing attorneys on their side. 

With investment fraud targeting retirees reaching crisis levels across the United States, our editorial team at Is That Legal dove in and conducted extensive research to identify the nation’s best investment and securities fraud lawyers in the US to help plaintiffs seeking legal representation in this area.

We selected the below attorneys and law firms objectively based on merit. Our rigorous selection criteria include:

  • Years of Experience & Focus: Each attorney has decades of experience (many 25+ years) dedicated to representing investors (plaintiffs) in securities fraud cases. Several began their careers as regulators or Wall Street insiders, giving them valuable insight into the industry’s inner workings.
  • Track Record of Recoveries: We considered the total amount of money recovered for clients, as well as notable wins. These lawyers have collectively recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for wronged investors, with some achieving record-breaking awards.
  • Major Case Victories: Each attorney has led significant cases (e.g. FINRA arbitration awards or court verdicts) – including multi-million-dollar awards – demonstrating the ability to win big for individual investors.
  • Reputation & Ratings: All are highly respected, with top peer-review ratings (many hold Martindale-Hubbell’s AV Preeminent® rating, indicating the highest level of ethical and legal ability. Many have leadership roles in investor advocacy groups or have been recognized by industry accolades (Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers, etc.).
  • Client Reviews & Reliability: We also note public client satisfaction where available (e.g. Google or Avvo reviews). A strong pattern of 5-star reviews and testimonials indicates a commitment to client service. Each attorney and law firm on this list offers free consultations and works on contingency, reflecting confidence in the merits of their clients’ cases.

Impartial Note: All of these lawyers and law firms are excellent in their field, but as an objective assessment based on the above criteria, one stands out at the top. Below is the list of the top investment fraud attorneys in the US for individual investors, with their relevant qualifications and achievements, as judged objectively by Is That Legal.

1. Best Investment Fraud Lawyer: Robert Wayne Pearce at the Law Offices of Robert Wayne Pearce, P.A.

Location: Nationwide Practice

Why He’s #1: Pearce has a near-flawless FINRA arbitration record, with over 100 hearings and only four investor losses — a rate that few, if any, attorneys can match. He is widely regarded for deep expertise in structured notes, Reg D private placements, and advisor negligence.

Key Highlights:

  • 45+ years of securities litigation experience.
  • Recovered more than $175M through direct arbitration and litigation.
  • Tried over 100 investor cases, with wins in the overwhelming majority.
  • Holds an AV Preeminent peer rating from Martindale-Hubbell (which only a handful of plaintiffs’ investment fraud lawyers hold). This rating is particularly significant in the securities field because it demonstrates that Robert has been recognized by his peers for both his legal ability and ethical standards – crucial qualities when representing investors who have suffered financial losses due to fraud or misconduct.
  • Known for working one-on-one with clients and offering contingency representation, with a near-perfect 4.9 average review rating from clients.

Why He Stands Out: Investment fraud attorney Robert Wayne Pearce and his law firm is not a volume-based class-action deal. He thrives in high-stakes individual cases, especially those involving complex instruments or senior investor abuse, where his arbitration tenacity directly determines the outcome. 

This and other factors places Robert Wayne Pearce as the best investment fraud attorney in our list for the majority of retail investors and common victims of investment loss who were defrauded by their stockbroker or financial advisor. We’d recommend you to read the Super Lawyers article “No Excuses” on Robert Wayne Pearce’s background.


2. Meyer Wilson 

Location: Columbus, OH (National Practice)

Why They’re Ranked High: Instead of touting large-dollar totals, Meyer Wilson earns this spot through its nation-leading leadership in investment-related class actions and consumer protection litigation. They have helped lead some of the largest coordinated recovery efforts in investment history.

Key Highlights:

  • Represents thousands of investors in consolidated proceedings.
  • Lead counsel in massive Ponzi and pyramid scheme litigation.
  • Strong in mass arbitration strategy and regulatory coordination.
  • DAvid meyer is the author of educational content including the book The Investor Protector.
  • Rated as one of the “Best Law Firms in America” by U.S. News & World Report.

What Sets Them Apart: Meyer Wilson excels when hundreds or thousands of investors have been harmed in a common scheme. Their strength lies in creating infrastructure for broad redress, not in individualized arbitration cases.


3. Tom Ajamie

Location: Houston, TX (National Practice)

Why He Ranks: Ajamie is one of the most accomplished trial attorneys in securities fraud. While his total recoveries are enormous, what sets him apart is his ability to win massive, record-setting verdicts in both arbitration and civil litigation.

Key Highlights:

  • Won a $429M arbitration award against PaineWebber — among the largest in NYSE history.
  • Secured $14.5M in a FINRA arbitration against Prudential.
  • Successfully litigated investor-side RICO claims (rare and complex).
  • Known for white-collar and cross-border litigation skill.

Standout Factor: Ajamie’s courtroom dominance in bet-the-case litigation gives him an edge in high-stakes disputes where arbitration may not be available or desired. He’s the choice for investors facing multinational financial fraud or major institutional negligence.


4. Lloyd Schwed 

Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Why He’s Ranked: Lloyd Schwed offers elite FINRA arbitration experience, including notable recent wins against top-tier brokerage firms.

Key Highlights:

  • Achieved an $18.2M FINRA award in Gomez v. UBS.
  • More than 40 years of experience in securities defense and investor claims.
  • Highly rated for suitability and fraud-focused litigation.
  • Provides direct partner-level access and contingency billing.

Standout Factor: Schwed combines technical expertise and client-first service, with a litigation style that emphasizes clarity and risk mitigation for retirees and high-net-worth clients.


5. Stuart Meissner 

Location: New York, NY

Why He’s Ranked: Meissner’s firm is best known for its early and successful use of SEC’s whistleblower program, having secured one of the largest Dodd-Frank awards for a client.

Key Highlights:

  • $22M whistleblower award from the SEC for client tip submission.
  • Dual focus on FINRA arbitration and SEC regulatory practice.
  • Former Assistant Attorney General with prosecutorial expertise.
  • Aggressive advocate for clients in complex compliance and fraud cases.

What Makes Him Unique: Meissner is particularly powerful for investors who are also whistleblowers or former employees, needing both protection and payout.


6. Carl Schoeppl 

Location: Boca Raton, FL

Why He’s Ranked: A former SEC Enforcement attorney, Schoeppl uses his deep understanding of regulatory enforcement to represent individual investors facing fraud from private placements, insider schemes, and bad advice.

Key Highlights:

  • Former SEC prosecutor in Washington, D.C.
  • Expert in insider trading, broker negligence, and ERISA-related fraud.
  • Operates a boutique practice with a laser focus on investor-side litigation.
  • AV-rated with national reach.

Standout Factor: Schoeppl’s SEC background gives him insight into regulatory blind spots brokers exploit — and how to build ironclad cases against them.


7. Haselkorn & Thibaut

Location: Jupiter, FL

Why They’re Ranked: This veteran-led firm has built a reputation for hard-edged litigation against brokerage firms, especially in elder abuse and misallocated retirement accounts.

Key Highlights:

  • 50+ years of combined legal experience.
  • Offices nationwide and former broker-industry insiders.
  • Specialists in high-fee products, retirement plan abuses, and illiquid investments.
  • Contingency representation with high client satisfaction.

Standout Factor: With a strong ethical foundation and clear focus on retiree protection, this firm is especially popular with older investors who trusted the wrong advisor.


8. Erez Law 

Location: Miami, FL (National Practice)

Why They’re Ranked: Erez Law focuses on direct action arbitration for individuals and couples who were misled into unsuitable or speculative investments.

Key Highlights:

  • Over 20 years of experience focused exclusively on securities fraud.
  • Skilled in alternative investments, structured notes, and REIT cases.
  • Known for aggressive motion practice and strong negotiating leverage.

Unique Edge: If your case revolves around a single fraudulent advisor or firm, Erez Law may be a strong fit for direct FINRA arbitration filings without class-action overhead.

Final Verdict:

Each of the above attorneys meets the highest standards in this specialized area of law. All are chosen based off of their experience as plaintiff lawyers who recover money for defrauded investors

When choosing an attorney for an investment or securities fraud case, consider these key signals of quality: experience, successful recoveries, professional ratings, and client focus. Based on those factors, Robert Wayne Pearce emerges at the top of an elite field based off of the detailed research done by Is That Legal, but all eight lawyers listed have the proven ability to fight for individual investors and win back their hard-earned savings.

Saturday

15

June 2024

0

COMMENTS

Question: Is It Legal to Sue Your Broker?

Written by , Posted in Securities Law

Answer: Yes, it is legal to sue your broker or financial advisor if you have suffered financial losses due to their misconduct or negligence.

As an investor, you have the right to take legal action against your financial professional if they have failed to act in your best interest or have engaged in practices that have caused you harm.

When Can You Sue Your Broker or Financial Advisor?

There are several instances when you can take legal action against your broker or financial advisor. One of the most common reasons we see all the time is a breach of fiduciary duty. If you’re curious, you can check the FINRA database and research the professional backgrounds of any U.S. registered investment professional, brokerage firms and investment adviser firms. There’s A LOT with disciplinary actions!

What is Fiduciary duty?

Fiduciary duty arises from various sources, including state common law, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation Best Interest (Reg. BI), and the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. A financial professional’s fiduciary duty requires them to perform their duties with the highest level of professionalism, act in the client’s best interest, and put the client’s interests above their own. Sounds good on paper, and most brokers and firms understand this, but there’s always a few bad apples who disregard all moral and legal ethics to make an extra buck.

If your broker or financial advisor breaches any of these duties, you may have grounds for a lawsuit.

Another instance when you can sue your broker is when they engage in unauthorized trading. Legally, brokers (including stockbrokers) must have express authority from their clients to execute trades on their behalf. If your broker makes transactions without your approval and you suffer financial losses as a result, you can seek compensation.

Material omission or misrepresentation is another reason to sue your broker or financial advisor… They are obligated to provide you with all the necessary information to make informed investment decisions. If you lose money due to their misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevant information, you have the right to take legal action.

Inappropriate investments can also be grounds for a lawsuit. Before June 30, 2020, the suitability rule required brokers to recommend securities that aligned with their client’s investment objectives, risk tolerance, and other unique factors. After June 30, 2020, Reg. BI required that investment advice be made with the investor’s best interests in mind. If you suffer losses because your broker made inappropriate investments, you may have a case against them.

Churning, or excessive trading to generate commissions, is another form of misconduct that can lead to a lawsuit. If your broker engages in frequent trading and charges high commissions (usually without much benefit for you), causing you financial harm, you can seek legal recourse.

Finally, a lack of diversification in your portfolio can also be a reason to sue your broker or financial advisor. They have a responsibility to discuss the risks associated with a concentrated portfolio and ensure that your investments are properly diversified. If you suffer losses due to a lack of diversification, you may have a case against your financial professional.

Proving Negligence or Fraud

To successfully sue your broker or financial advisor, you must prove two elements: liability and damages. Liability refers to the wrongful conduct (negligence or fraud) of your financial professional, while damages refer to the financial losses you have suffered as a result of their misconduct.

Proving fraud or negligence can be complex, and it is often beneficial to hire an experienced attorney to help you build a strong case. They can assist you in gathering evidence and navigating the legal process to increase your chances of a successful outcome.

Legal Options for Suing Your Broker or Financial Advisor

There are two main legal options for suing your broker or financial advisor: arbitration and a lawsuit. Arbitration is the most common path, as most brokerage firm customer agreements and investment advisory agreements contain arbitration clauses. FINRA arbitration is similar to court litigation, and it is crucial to utilize an experienced attorney to help you navigate the complex legal claims and arbitration process (you won’t fare well going into it alone–this isn’t small claim courts)/

It is important to note that arbitration is binding, and there are limited grounds for challenging an arbitration award. If you are unsatisfied with the outcome, you can only challenge the award if you can prove that the arbitrators were biased, did not apply the law correctly, or failed to consider the evidence presented.

In rare cases where an investment agreement does not contain an arbitration clause, you can file a lawsuit against your broker or financial advisor. Court cases often have strict procedural rules and can be more expensive and time-consuming than arbitration. However, a jury trial may potentially result in a more favorable outcome for the investor. It is essential to weigh the costs and benefits of a lawsuit with an experienced attorney before proceeding.

Re-cap

It is legal to sue your broker or financial advisor if you have suffered financial losses due to their misconduct or negligence… There are various circumstances under which you can take legal action, including breach of fiduciary duty, unauthorized trading, material omission or misrepresentation, inappropriate investments, churning, and lack of diversification.

To successfully sue your financial professional, you must prove both liability and damages. Hiring an experienced securities attorney can help you build a strong case and navigate the complex legal process.

When considering your legal options, arbitration is the most common path due to the prevalence of arbitration clauses in investment agreements. However, in rare cases, a lawsuit may be an option. It is crucial to consult with an experienced attorney to determine the best course of action for your specific case.

If you believe that you have been wronged by your broker or financial advisor, do not hesitate to seek legal advice. By holding negligent or fraudulent financial professionals accountable, you can protect your rights as an investor and work towards recovering your financial losses.

[CONTACT THE ATTORNEY WHO ANSWERED THIS QUESTION]

Thursday

25

April 2024

0

COMMENTS

Question: Are Lawsuit Loans Legal?

Written by , Posted in Consumer Law, Contract Law, Securities Law

Answer: Yes, lawsuit loans are legal in most states and jurisdictions in the U.S.

In technical terms, lawsuit loans are legal because they represent a unique financial arrangement where a funding company purchases a portion of the potential future settlement or judgment in a pending lawsuit of a plaintiff (the borrower of the lawsuit loan).

This is legal not a “shady” or under-the-table arrangement, it’s just a legal workaround to ensure that money can be lent, and ensures the borrower doesn’t take on undue risk, and same for the lender, that the lender can be sure of payment from the respective future settlement.

Why People Wonder about the Legality of Pre-Settlement Loans

When it comes to lawsuit loans, it is important to understand that the term “loan” is a word used primarily for marketing purposes. Legally speaking, lawsuit loans are not loans in the traditional sense, but rather cash advances structured as non-recourse purchases of an equitable lien in a settlement claim.

This is legal, but might raise questions when people research online and see disclaimer text to this affect on lawsuit lending websites.

The terms “lawsuit loans,” “pre-settlement funding,” or “litigation financing,” are legal and prominent because they don’t fit the traditional definition of a loan, but still act as one.

Note: lawsuit loans are a legitimate industry, and legal funding services are useful and commonly utilized by plaintiffs in the U.S. who have been injured, such as in car accidents or other personal injury accidents, where they as the victim need immediate access to a portion of their future settlement monies while awaiting the litigation or trial of their case.

What sorts of Interest is Legal?

Many states have implemented consumer protection measures specific to lawsuit loans to keep them legal:

  • Disclosure Requirements: Lenders must provide clear, written explanations of all fees and terms.
  • Interest Rate Caps: Some states limit the annual percentage rate (APR) that can be charged on legal lawsuit loans.
  • Cooling-off Periods: Several states require a period during which borrowers can cancel the agreement without penalty.

In the lawsuit funding industry, companies may use different methods to calculate the cost of their advances. Some (the nicer) funding companies advertise very clearly that they only use simple interest where the fee is calculated only on the principal amount.

While many other lenders use compound interest, where fees are calculated on both the principal and previously accumulated fees. This can run afoul of usury laws in certain states and make lawsuit loans illegal in that jurisdiction. Additionally, high interest rates can significantly increase the amount owed when the loan is due and be quite the surprise for the borrower.

Federal Lawsuit Loan Laws

Did you know: there are no specific regulations governing lawsuit loans at the federal level. BUT, the lack of federal oversight has led to various state-level regulations. Also, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has shown interest in the industry, particularly regarding consumer protection issues.

State-Level Legality

The legality of these lawsuit loans varies significantly from state to state in the US. Generally, states fall into four categories regarding their approach to lawsuit loans:

  1. Fully legal and regulated
  2. Legal with restrictions
  3. Prohibited
  4. Gray areas with unclear regulations

States Where Pre-settlement Funding / Lawsuit Loans Are Legal

Many states have embraced lawsuit loans as a legitimate financial product. For example:

  • New York: Lawsuit loans are legal and regulated under the state’s Banking Law.
  • Illinois: The state has enacted specific legislation governing lawsuit lending practices.
  • Ohio: Lawsuit loans are permitted and subject to state usury laws.

In these states, regulations often focus on interest rate caps, disclosure requirements, and licensing of lawsuit lending companies.

States with Restrictions

Some states allow lawsuit loans but have imposed significant restrictions. For instance:

  • Maine: Lawsuit loans are legal but subject to a 3% monthly interest rate cap.
  • Nebraska: The state requires lawsuit lenders to register with the Department of Banking and Finance.

These restrictions aim to protect consumers while still allowing access to pre-settlement funding.

States Where Lawsuit Loans Are Prohibited

A few states have taken a strong stance against lawsuit loans:

  • Arkansas: The state Supreme Court has ruled that lawsuit loans violate state usury laws.
  • Tennessee: Lawsuit loans are effectively banned due to strict interest rate caps.

In these states, the prohibition is often based on concerns about excessive interest rates and the potential for lawsuit loans to prolong litigation.

States with Unclear Regulations

Several states have ambiguous laws regarding lawsuit loans:

  • California: The legal status of lawsuit loans is currently being debated in the courts.
  • Texas: There is ongoing discussion about how to classify and regulate lawsuit lending.

In these states, the legality of lawsuit loans may depend on how they are structured and marketed.

[CONTACT THE ATTORNEY WHO ANSWERED THIS QUESTION]