July 2024

AT&T data breach lawsuit: Can you actually receive a $750 settlement?

Written by , Posted in Consumer Law, Contract Law, Cybersecurity Law

Answer: Maybe. If you’re a current or former AT&T customer whose Personally Identifiable Information (PII) was compromised in the breach, you may be entitled to significant compensation in a class action lawsuit. 

Lawsuit Update: California residents, in particular, could be eligible for up to a $750 settlement amount under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Eligibility and compensation amounts can vary based on the specific impact of the exfiltration of your personal and financial data.

If you received notice of the AT&T breach you can open a claim by filling out this claim form.

AT&T blue logo and black text for legal uses 2024 data breach lawsuit

How Can I Claim Compensation? 

To claim compensation, you may need to sign-up and join a class-action lawsuit or file an individual claim. Or you can do nothing and await the legal proceedings.

We’ve seen several prominent law firms take action in response to the 2024 AT&T data breach by filing class action lawsuits on behalf of affected customers in the U.S. These firms are actively seeking to hold AT&T accountable for the data breach / hack and to secure compensation for impacted individuals, up to $750 per victim and possibly more.

Mason LLP, Gibbs Law Group, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Barnes Law Group, Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, and DiCello Levitt LLP are jointly representing plaintiffs in a class action suit against AT&T. 

Beasley Allen has also initiated a class action lawsuit on behalf of affected customers in efforts to increase settlement totals. Labaton Keller Sucharow is also investigating private arbitration claims against AT&T for California residents.

AT&T Data Breach 2024 Lawsuit Compensation Form

You can submit your AT&T lawsuit compensation claim form to the administrator to prove that you are entitled to part of the settlement if your personal data was compromised in the AT&T data breach. You can do so by filling out this sign-up form.

Note: When working with a lawyer, be aware of the statute of limitations for data breach claims in your state. Provide any evidence of your AT&T account, breach notifications received, and documentation of related expenses or identity theft incidents.

What Types of Compensation Are Available? 

Potential settlement Dollar amounts may include reimbursement for financial losses, free credit monitoring services, identity theft protection, and in some cases, statutory damages. Some lawsuits are also seeking compensation for the time and effort spent dealing with the aftermath of the hack/breach.

How Much of a Settlement Can I Expect? 

The final settlement amount can vary widely depending on factors such as your location, the extent of damages you’ve suffered, and the outcome of legal proceedings. While California residents may be eligible for up to $750, actual amounts could be lower or higher based on individual circumstances and the overall resolution of claims against AT&T. As for the question of “how much of a settlement can I get,” we won’t know until this lawsuit proceeds through the judicial system.

What Evidence Do I Need to Provide? 

You may need to provide evidence of your AT&T account, any notification you received about the breach, and documentation of any financial losses or identity theft incidents related to the breach. Keep records of time spent addressing the breach’s impact and any associated expenses.

What Legal Steps Should I Take? 

Consider consulting with a lawyer experienced in data breach cases. They can help you understand your rights, assess the strength of your claim, and determine whether joining a class action or pursuing individual legal action is most appropriate for your situation. You can start a claim here which takes less than 2 minutes. 

What is AT&T Offering Currently? 

At the moment (July 2024), ATT is offering a suggestion for users to change their password and such, which can be found at AT&T has also stated it will offer credit monitoring at its expense where applicable. However, this is just the first step that companies like this take, and it may not be sufficient to cover all potential damages. It’s important to understand your rights and explore all available options for settlement beyond what AT&T is voluntarily offering. 

Are There Deadlines for Signing Up and Filing Claims? 

While specific deadlines haven’t been publicized by the law firms representing the plaintiffs, it’s crucial to act promptly. Statutes of limitations for data breach claims vary by state and can impact your eligibility for compensation. Consulting with a lawyer early can help ensure you don’t miss important deadlines.

Will My Claim and Settlement Affect My Relationship with AT&T?

Pursuing compensation should not negatively impact your service with AT&T. Consumer protection laws generally prohibit retaliation against customers for exercising their legal rights. However, if you have concerns, discuss them with your class action lawyer who can provide guidance specific to your situation.

What You Can Do Next:

Data breach attorneys and former cybersecurity experts advocate for the rights of consumers impacted by such incident. You may want to sign up and work with one of these law firms as a plaintiff. 

If you received notice of the AT&T breach and would like to see if you qualify for a settlement up to $750, you can start a claim here which takes less than 2 minutes.



July 2024

Question: Are Nootropics Actually Legal?

Written by , Posted in Criminal Law

Answer: Yes. In the United States, nootropics are legal to buy over-the-counter as long as they do not contain controlled substances. They are popular supplements, and most of us have some form of nootropics in our medicine cabinet.

From what we can see, the U.S. is relatively lax on nootropic compounds compared to other countries.

All purchasable nootropics and supplements that are to be ingested are governed by some level federal laws and regulations, primarily the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994. Under DSHEA, dietary supplements, including many nootropics, can be sold and marketed without prior approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), provided they meet certain criteria:

  • The product must be intended to supplement the diet
  • It must contain one or more dietary ingredients (vitamins, minerals, herbs, amino acids, etc.)
  • It must be labeled as a dietary supplement
  • It must not be represented as a conventional food or sole item of a meal or diet

Sadly if there is a conflict of interest and a natural supplement has potential to take away market share from new and expensive pharmaceutical drugs, lobbying of government officials is common and the banning of natural substances has been known to happen.

High-performing nootropic compounds with strong brain-boosting and neurorestorative properties such as Noocube are still legal and available as of July 2024, but the future is not guaranteed.

bottle of green nootropic pills reference illustration

Specific nootropics and their legal status:

  • Racetams (e.g., Piracetam, Aniracetam): Racetams are synthetic compounds that are not approved for medical use in the United States. However, they are generally considered legal to purchase and possess for personal use. We’ve seen the bottles from Nootropics Depot labeled as “for non-clinical research use only” as a way for them to cover their backsides in case of an overdose or in case of future litigation.
  • Natural nootropics (e.g., Bacopa Monnieri, Ginkgo Biloba): Most natural nootropics are legal in the United States when sold as dietary supplements, provided they comply with DSHEA regulations.
  • Prescription nootropics (e.g., Modafinil, Adderall): These substances are only legal when prescribed by a licensed medical professional for treating specific conditions, such as narcolepsy or ADHD. Possessing or using them without a valid prescription is illegal.

It’s essential to note that some states may have stricter laws and regulations regarding nootropics. Always check your local laws to ensure compliance.

Big List of Common but “Edgy” brain vitamins and if they are clearly legal or not:

  • Cyclazodone (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Phenibut (unscheduled but not approved as a dietary supplement by the FDA)
  • IDRA-21 (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • NSI-189 (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Adrafinil (unscheduled but not approved as a dietary supplement by the FDA)
  • 9-Me-BC (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Sunifiram (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Picamilon (banned by the FDA, not allowed to be sold as a dietary supplement)
  • Cortexin (not approved for use in the US)
  • PRL-8-53 (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • NACET (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Selank (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Semax (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • TAK-653 (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Coluracetam (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Fasoracetam (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Hydrafinil (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Armodafinil (Schedule IV controlled substance, requires prescription)
  • Modafinil (Schedule IV controlled substance, requires prescription)
  • J147 (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Bromantane (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Unifiram (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Nefiracetam (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Phenylpiracetam (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Tropisetron (approved for use in the US as an anti-nausea medication, requires prescription)
  • Cerebrolysin (not approved for use in the US)
  • F-Phenibut (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)
  • Fladrafinil (legal status unclear, not approved for human consumption)

Examples of a Nootropics Company Getting into Legal Trouble

In August 2023, Nootropics Depot and its owner, MisterYouAreSoDumb, were charged by the US Department of Justice with criminal counts related to the sale of tianeptine, adrafinil, phenibut, and racetam drugs between April 2017 and December 2021. The company Centera Bioscience received one count, while the general manager received two counts.

The charges against Nootropics Depot are part of a larger crackdown on supplements and nootropics led by Dr. Pieter D. Cohen, who has been criticized for his aggressive stance against these substances. The case has sparked discussions about the regulation of nootropics, the role of online communities in shaping public opinion, and the potential biases of those involved in the industry.

Legal Status of Nootropics in Europe In Europe

The legal status of nootropics is determined by the European Union (EU) regulations and individual country laws. As a dual-citizen of the US and EU, I would state:

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is responsible for assessing the safety of food supplements, including nootropics. They provide guidelines and opinions on the use of various substances, which member states can use to establish their own regulations.

Country-specific laws and regulations:

  • United Kingdom: In the UK, most nootropics are legal to purchase and possess, provided they are not sold as medicines or make medicinal claims. However, some nootropics, such as Modafinil, require a prescription.
  • Germany: Germany has stricter regulations on nootropics compared to many other EU countries. Some racetams, like Piracetam, are only available with a prescription.

Legal Status of Nootropics in Other Regions


  • China has a complex regulatory system for nootropics, with some substances being legal and others requiring a prescription or being banned altogether.
  • Japan has a more lenient approach to nootropics, with many substances available over-the-counter or online.

Australia and New Zealand:

  • The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regulates nootropics in Australia. Many natural nootropics are legal, while synthetic substances may require a prescription or be prohibited.

South America:

  • Brazil has a growing nootropics market, with many substances legal to purchase and consume.
  • Argentina has a legal framework similar to the United States, with most nootropics falling under dietary supplement regulations.

Legality of Purchasing and Possession of Nootropics

When buying nootropics online, it’s crucial to understand the legality of your purchase. Domestic purchases are generally safer, as they are subject to your country’s laws and regulations. International purchases may be riskier, as substances legal in one country may be illegal in another.

Always purchase nootropics from verified, reputable sources to ensure quality and safety. Buying from unverified sources may expose you to counterfeit or contaminated products, which can be harmful to your health.

Possessing illegal nootropics can lead to serious legal consequences, including fines and imprisonment. Always research the legal status of a substance before purchasing or using it.

Future Developments in Nootropic Legislation

As research on nootropics continues to expand, governments worldwide may update their regulations to address new findings and emerging trends. Some countries may choose to tighten their control over these substances, while others may opt for a more relaxed approach.

Staying informed about the latest developments in nootropic legislation is essential for anyone interested in using these cognitive enhancers. Regularly check your local laws and consult with legal experts if you have any doubts or concerns.


  1. Q: Are all nootropics legal in the United States? A: No, not all nootropics are legal in the U.S. Some, like prescription drugs (e.g., Modafinil, Adderall), are only legal with a valid prescription. Others, such as many natural nootropics, are legal when sold as dietary supplements.
  2. Q: Can I buy nootropics online legally? A: It depends on the specific nootropic and your location. Some nootropics are legal to purchase online, while others may require a prescription or be prohibited altogether. Always research your country’s laws before making an online purchase.
  3. Q: What happens if I possess an illegal nootropic? A: Possessing an illegal nootropic can lead to serious legal consequences, such as fines and imprisonment. The severity of the punishment depends on the substance, quantity, and your location.
  4. Q: Are nootropics regulated by the FDA? A: The FDA does not regulate most nootropics, as they are classified as dietary supplements under DSHEA. However, the FDA can take action against manufacturers if their products are unsafe or their claims are false or misleading.
  5. Q: Can I travel internationally with nootropics? A: It depends on the laws of the countries you are traveling to and from. Some nootropics may be legal in one country but illegal in another. Always research the laws of your destination country and consult with customs officials before traveling with nootropics.
  6. Q: Are natural nootropics safer than synthetic ones? A: Not necessarily. While many natural nootropics have a history of safe use, they can still cause side effects or interact with other medications. Synthetic nootropics may be more potent but also have a higher risk of adverse effects. Always consult with a healthcare professional before using any nootropic.
  7. Q: Can I get a prescription for nootropics? A: Some nootropics, like Modafinil and Adderall, are prescription drugs in many countries. To get a prescription, you must have a diagnosed condition that the drug is approved to treat, such as narcolepsy or ADHD. Doctors do not typically prescribe nootropics for cognitive enhancement in healthy individuals.
  8. Q: Are there age restrictions for buying nootropics? A: Age restrictions for purchasing nootropics vary by country and the specific substance. In the United States, you must be at least 18 years old to purchase dietary supplements, which include many nootropics. Prescription nootropics may have different age requirements.
  9. Q: How can I ensure I’m buying nootropics from a reputable source? A: To ensure you’re buying from a reputable source, look for companies that:
    • Provide third-party lab testing results for their products
    • Have a good reputation and customer reviews
    • Clearly list ingredients and dosages
    • Offer transparency about their manufacturing processes
    • Have a physical address and contact information
  10. Q: Can I legally sell nootropics? A: The legality of selling nootropics depends on the specific substance and your location. In the United States, you can legally sell most nootropics as dietary supplements if you comply with DSHEA regulations and do not make false or misleading claims. Always research your local laws and consult with legal experts before selling any nootropics.

In Summary

The legal status of nootropics varies globally, with regulations differing between countries and even states within a country. In the United States, many nootropics are legal when sold as dietary supplements, while Europe has a more complex regulatory framework governed by the EFSA and country-specific laws.

As a prospective nootropic user, it is your responsibility to stay informed about the legal status of these substances in your region, especially if they are a controlled substance.




June 2024

Question: Is It Legal to Sue Your Broker?

Written by , Posted in Securities Law

Answer: Yes, it is legal to sue your broker or financial advisor if you have suffered financial losses due to their misconduct or negligence.

As an investor, you have the right to take legal action against your financial professional if they have failed to act in your best interest or have engaged in practices that have caused you harm.

When Can You Sue Your Broker or Financial Advisor?

There are several instances when you can take legal action against your broker or financial advisor. One of the most common reasons we see all the time is a breach of fiduciary duty. If you’re curious, you can check the FINRA database and research the professional backgrounds of any U.S. registered investment professional, brokerage firms and investment adviser firms. There’s A LOT with disciplinary actions!

What is Fiduciary duty?

Fiduciary duty arises from various sources, including state common law, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation Best Interest (Reg. BI), and the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. A financial professional’s fiduciary duty requires them to perform their duties with the highest level of professionalism, act in the client’s best interest, and put the client’s interests above their own. Sounds good on paper, and most brokers and firms understand this, but there’s always a few bad apples who disregard all moral and legal ethics to make an extra buck.

If your broker or financial advisor breaches any of these duties, you may have grounds for a lawsuit.

Another instance when you can sue your broker is when they engage in unauthorized trading. Legally, brokers (including stockbrokers) must have express authority from their clients to execute trades on their behalf. If your broker makes transactions without your approval and you suffer financial losses as a result, you can seek compensation.

Material omission or misrepresentation is another reason to sue your broker or financial advisor… They are obligated to provide you with all the necessary information to make informed investment decisions. If you lose money due to their misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevant information, you have the right to take legal action.

Inappropriate investments can also be grounds for a lawsuit. Before June 30, 2020, the suitability rule required brokers to recommend securities that aligned with their client’s investment objectives, risk tolerance, and other unique factors. After June 30, 2020, Reg. BI required that investment advice be made with the investor’s best interests in mind. If you suffer losses because your broker made inappropriate investments, you may have a case against them.

Churning, or excessive trading to generate commissions, is another form of misconduct that can lead to a lawsuit. If your broker engages in frequent trading and charges high commissions (usually without much benefit for you), causing you financial harm, you can seek legal recourse.

Finally, a lack of diversification in your portfolio can also be a reason to sue your broker or financial advisor. They have a responsibility to discuss the risks associated with a concentrated portfolio and ensure that your investments are properly diversified. If you suffer losses due to a lack of diversification, you may have a case against your financial professional.

Proving Negligence or Fraud

To successfully sue your broker or financial advisor, you must prove two elements: liability and damages. Liability refers to the wrongful conduct (negligence or fraud) of your financial professional, while damages refer to the financial losses you have suffered as a result of their misconduct.

Proving fraud or negligence can be complex, and it is often beneficial to hire an experienced attorney to help you build a strong case. They can assist you in gathering evidence and navigating the legal process to increase your chances of a successful outcome.

Legal Options for Suing Your Broker or Financial Advisor

There are two main legal options for suing your broker or financial advisor: arbitration and a lawsuit. Arbitration is the most common path, as most brokerage firm customer agreements and investment advisory agreements contain arbitration clauses. FINRA arbitration is similar to court litigation, and it is crucial to utilize an experienced attorney to help you navigate the complex legal claims and arbitration process (you won’t fare well going into it alone–this isn’t small claim courts)/

It is important to note that arbitration is binding, and there are limited grounds for challenging an arbitration award. If you are unsatisfied with the outcome, you can only challenge the award if you can prove that the arbitrators were biased, did not apply the law correctly, or failed to consider the evidence presented.

In rare cases where an investment agreement does not contain an arbitration clause, you can file a lawsuit against your broker or financial advisor. Court cases often have strict procedural rules and can be more expensive and time-consuming than arbitration. However, a jury trial may potentially result in a more favorable outcome for the investor. It is essential to weigh the costs and benefits of a lawsuit with an experienced attorney before proceeding.


It is legal to sue your broker or financial advisor if you have suffered financial losses due to their misconduct or negligence… There are various circumstances under which you can take legal action, including breach of fiduciary duty, unauthorized trading, material omission or misrepresentation, inappropriate investments, churning, and lack of diversification.

To successfully sue your financial professional, you must prove both liability and damages. Hiring an experienced securities attorney can help you build a strong case and navigate the complex legal process.

When considering your legal options, arbitration is the most common path due to the prevalence of arbitration clauses in investment agreements. However, in rare cases, a lawsuit may be an option. It is crucial to consult with an experienced attorney to determine the best course of action for your specific case.

If you believe that you have been wronged by your broker or financial advisor, do not hesitate to seek legal advice. By holding negligent or fraudulent financial professionals accountable, you can protect your rights as an investor and work towards recovering your financial losses.




June 2024

Question: Is It Legal to Grow Psychedelic (Magic) Mushrooms in the U.S.?

Written by , Posted in Criminal Law

Answer: No, it is not legal for you to grow, sell or posses psychedelic mushrooms in America because psilocybin and psilocyn, the key psychoactive compounds in these “shrooms” are classified as Schedule I substances under the federal Controlled Substances Act.

However, it is perfectly legal for somone to sell, purchase and own psilocybin mushroom spores because the spores themselves do not contain the controlled substances psilocybin or psilocyn and are therefore not regulated under the Controlled Substances Act (under §812. Schedules of controlled substances) or other laws.

Using injectable spores or swabs to inoculate and cultivate psychedelic mushroom “fruits” or even mycelium however is illegal regardless of the legal status of the spores themselves. If you are harvesting “caps and stems” can put you into felony territory, especially when done at scale. Grow bags and kits and other paraphernalia can be bought and sold without any issues.

Always remember, just because something is decriminalized doesn’t mean it’s legal or risk-free (always ask yourself, “could a DA or persecutor find a gray area or loophole to convict me?” In most cases you won’t know, which is where an experienced lawyer’s input and help is needed).

Federal Legal Status of Growing Psychedelic Mushrooms

As we’d expect, under federal law, it’s unambiguously illegal to manufacture, distribute, or possess the psychoactive compounds in psychedelic mushrooms, also known on the street by drug dealers as “shrooms” or “mush.” This prohibition extends to several specific species, including psilocybe cubensis (commonly called Golden Teacher among aficionados) and psilocybe semilanceata. If you’re caught growing (even if you’re not selling) these mushrooms, you could face serious consequences:

  • Prison sentences ranging from a few years to decades, depending on the scale of the operation and your criminal history
  • Fines that can reach hundreds of thousands of dollars
  • A permanent criminal record that can impact your employment, housing, and other aspects of your life

There have been several high-profile federal prosecutions related to psychedelic mushrooms:

  1. Example psilocybinrelated Colorado Case (2021): In Colorado, federal prosecutors charged several individuals with conspiracy to cultivate and distribute psychedelic mushrooms across state lines. This operation was significant as it involved a large-scale distribution network, and the individuals faced serious charges with potential long-term prison sentences.
  2. Example psilocybinrelated California Case (2019): In 2019, a man in California was sentenced to prison for running a large-scale psychedelic mushroom cultivation and distribution network. The operation was substantial, and the prosecution emphasized the seriousness of distributing a Schedule I controlled substance.
  3. Example psilocybinrelated Military Case (2020): An Air Force Academy cadet faced a special court-martial for using psilocybin. Although he received a relatively light sentence due to a plea deal, it highlighted the strict enforcement policies within the military against the use of such substances.

These cases demonstrate the federal government’s commitment to prosecuting large-scale psilocybin operations, despite varying state-level decriminalization efforts.

State and Local Legal Status

While psychedelic mushrooms are off-limits under federal law, enforcement largely falls to state and local authorities. Some states have taken steps to decriminalize or deprioritize enforcement against their cultivation:

Oregon has decriminalized possession of small amounts of psychedelic mushrooms (see official state government guide here), making it a civil infraction rather than a criminal offense. California has made possession of psilocybin-containing mushrooms the lowest law enforcement priority. Colorado is considering legislation to legalize psilocybin compounds for therapeutic use.

At the city level, several jurisdictions have passed decriminalization measures:

Denver has made arresting people for psilocybin-containing mushroom offenses the lowest law enforcement priority. Oakland has decriminalized possession and cultivation of small amounts of psilocybin.

However, it’s important to understand the limits of these measures. They don’t override federal law, and they usually only apply to small amounts for personal use. Commercial cultivation remains prohibited.

Outside of the USA?

We don’t know the laws and regulations of other countries outside of the USA and don’t want to comment on them. Please do your own research and get legal counsel in whichever country you’re in if you plan to consume steroids and start a “cycle” as part of your strength training routine.

Are Psilocybin-containing Mushroom Spores Legal to Buy?

The legality of purchasing and possessing psilocybin “shroom” spores varies by jurisdiction, but generally, it is legal in many places to buy and own these spores. The primary reason for this is that the spores themselves do not contain psilocybin or psilocyn, the psychoactive compounds that are classified as controlled substances under the Controlled Substances Act in the United States. Since psilocybin and psilocyn are the compounds that are regulated, and the spores do not contain them, the spores are not subject to the same legal restrictions.

However, once the spores are germinated and start to turn into mycelium or mushroom “fruits,” they begin to produce psilocybin and psilocyn, thus becoming controlled substances. But before you rush out to buy a spore kit, be aware that state laws can differ, with some explicitly banning the spores, so make sure you’re in a legal state.




May 2024

Question: Are SARMs Legal?

Written by , Posted in Criminal Law

Answer: Yes, SARMs are legal to sell and purchase in the U.S. as “research chemicals.” SARMs are not covered by the Controlled Substances Act or the Anabolic Steroids Control Act of 1990.

Additionally, SARMs aren’t illegal compounds–so having them in your possession is not a crime, and drug tests used in criminal cases such as drunk driving will not detect them. However, SARMs (also known as Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators) are not legal to be sold for human consumption or to be sold as a supplement (for example: as a bodybuilding supplement). In short, enforcement of SARMs is typically on the seller side and targets retailers who are promoting it as a supplement for human use.

In most countries, including the United States, SARMs are considered unapproved drugs and are illegal to sell, purchase, or possess for human use without a valid prescription or proper authorization from regulatory agencies such as the FDA. Of course there is no prescription available for SARMs or any doctor willing to prescribe one, so that point is moot. SARMs can be legally purchased online as “research chemicals,” and if you don’t ingest the compound then they aren’t illegal which puts it in a bit of a legal gray area.

In 2018, the U.S. Senate introduced the SARMs Control Act (S.2742), which aimed to amend the Controlled Substances Act to include SARMs as Schedule III controlled substances. The bill sought to criminalize the possession and distribution of SARMs without a valid prescription. But importantly, the SARMs Control Act did not become law! But it demonstrates the growing concern among lawmakers about the potential risks associated with these substances and the need for stricter regulation (so keep your eye on the legality going forward).

Anabolic steroids are of course illegal in the US, and so are most prohormones which were reclassified as Schedule III drugs in 2005. SARMs however have no such legal language against them, or any legal precedent either.

As such, many people still purchase and use SARMs for bodybuilding and performance enhancement purposes. The risk of getting caught and facing legal consequences is relatively low for individual users, as enforcement efforts primarily target suppliers and distributors rather than consumers.

The decision to use SARMs is a personal one that should be made after carefully considering the potential legal and health risks. If you’ve already made up your mind and want to get started taking SARMs regardless of the legal aspects, you can look into legal variations such as IBUTA 667, LIGAN 4033 and TESTOL 140 which can be purchased from the aforementioned source.

Read our other articles on these similar topics people often ask us:

Current (May 2024) legal status of SARMs in the United States

In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved SARMs for human use, classifying them as “unapproved drugs” and warns against side effects. The FDA has taken a firm stance against companies selling SARMs as dietary supplements, issuing warning letters to those making false claims about their products’ safety and efficacy. “The FDA is concerned about the potential health risks posed by these products,” states an agency spokesperson, “and we will continue to take action against companies that illegally market them.” So if you are selling SARMs online, you should be very careful on the verbiage and copywriting you use on your website. We suggest speaking with a qualified attorney in your state.

Despite the FDA’s position, SARMs are not currently listed under the Controlled Substances Act, which regulates drugs based on their potential for abuse and medical use. However, this could change in the future as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) continues to monitor the situation. “The legal status of SARMs is a moving target,” explains Dr. Michael Sachs a professor of law specializing in drug policy. “As more research emerges and public awareness grows, we may see a shift in how these substances are regulated.”

What About Prohormones vs SARMs?

From our legal perspective perspective, the main difference between SARMs (Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators) and prohormones is that while SARMs are currently unapproved drugs and are illegal to sell or distribute for human consumption, prohormones have been explicitly banned and classified as controlled substances in many countries. In the United States, the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004 amended the Controlled Substances Act to include prohormones, making them Schedule III controlled substances.

Legal Status of SARMs in Other Countries

  • Canada: In Canada, SARMs are considered “experimental drugs” and are illegal to sell without a prescription. Health Canada has taken enforcement actions against companies selling SARMs, including seizing products and issuing public warnings.
  • United Kingdom: In the UK, SARMs are classified as “medicinal products” and cannot be sold without a license from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The MHRA has prosecuted individuals and companies for illegally selling SARMs, resulting in fines and prison sentences.
  • Australia: Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) prohibits the sale, supply, or advertising of SARMs without a prescription. The TGA has taken action against several companies for illegally importing and distributing SARMs, leading to significant fines.

Legal Consequences/Penalties of Illegal SARMs Use and Distribution

In the U.S., possessing or distributing unapproved drugs can result in criminal charges, fines, and even imprisonment. While prosecutions specifically targeting SARMs users are relatively rare, the risk is still there. It’s essential to understand the potential legal ramifications before considering using these substances.

Businesses that sell SARMs illegally (by promoting them for bodybuilding or strength training) face even greater risks, including hefty fines, product seizures, and reputational damage. In recent years, several companies have been the target of legal action by the FDA and other regulatory agencies worldwide. “The message is clear,” states an FDA representative, “if you’re selling SARMs without proper approval, you’re putting your business and your customers at risk.”

Other Common Questions

Is it legal to travel with SARMs?

In most countries, including the United States, it is legal. SARMs are considered unapproved drugs or controlled substances in many jurisdictions, but they’re not a “scheduled drug” or a toxic or poisonous substance that would be dangerous to travel with, so yes it’s legal. Also a drug sniffing dog or screening swab at the airport is not calibrated to detect these substances.

SARMs vs Steroids Legality

While both SARMs and steroids both target androgen receptors, they are distinct substances.. SARMs are designed to selectively target specific tissues, such as muscle and bone, while minimizing side effects on other organs. In contrast, steroids have a more widespread effect on the body. Most countries legally categories SARMs much differently than steroids and under different legal frameworks.

Is RAD-140 illegal?

RAD-140, also known as Testolone, is a SARM that is not approved for human use by the FDA or other major regulatory agencies. As such, it is illegal to sell or market RAD-140 for human consumption in most countries, including the United States. Use of RAD-140 without a prescription may also be illegal, depending on the jurisdiction. Simply possessing RAD-140 however for “research purposes” is legal in the US by all indications.

Is MK-677 illegal?

MK-677, or Ibutamoren, is not a SARM but rather a growth hormone secretagogue. Like SARMs, MK-677 is not approved for human use by the FDA or other major regulatory agencies. That doesn’t necessarily mean you can’t buy it or use it in secret however, as it’s more of a CYA deal by the manufacturers and retailers. Selling, distributing, or possessing MK-677 not for human use is legal in the US and most countries

Can you fail a drug test for SARMs?

Likely no. While SARMs are not specifically targeted in most standard drug tests, some advanced testing methods can detect their presence (mostly in competitive sports and anti-doping tests). However some SARMs products may be contaminated with other substances that are detectable in drug tests. Athletes subject to anti-doping regulations should be especially cautious, as SARMs are prohibited by most sports organizations.

Can you use SARMs in the U.S. military?

The use of SARMs is prohibited in the U.S. military and many other armed forces worldwide. The Department of Defense considers SARMs to be “high risk” substances that can potentially compromise the health and readiness of service members. Military personnel found using SARMs may face disciplinary action, including court-martial, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The U.S. military doesn’t specifically test for SARMs in urine analysis or other drug tests, however if you’re caught with them in your possession they will want to know what it is and will likely find out!!


The legal status of SARMs (Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators) is complex and varies by country. In the United States, SARMs are considered unapproved drugs and are illegal to sell or distribute for human consumption without proper authorization, although they can be purchased legally as “research chemicals” if not ingested. The legal landscape is evolving, with lawmakers expressing concerns about potential risks and the need for stricter regulation. Despite this, many people still use SARMs for bodybuilding and performance enhancement. The decision to use SARMs should be made after carefully considering the potential legal and health risks, and staying informed about the evolving legal landscape surrounding these substances.